Complete Faculty Rankings

All 21 Instructors • Full Performance Data • Q1-Q7 Analysis

Faculty Performance Comparison

Performance Tier Analysis

Excellent

Ranks 1-5 • Avg: 4.93

Kenneth Ottinger
Jill Brugler
Dana Cohn
Thomas Schumacher
Laura Bloomenstein

Characteristics:

  • Consistently high scores across all Q dimensions
  • Scores 4.67 or above overall
  • Perfect or near-perfect Q2 scores

Above Average

Ranks 6-8 • Avg: 4.76

Kat Brint
Benjamin Norton
Stephanie Lauderback

Characteristics:

  • Consistently strong performance
  • Minor areas for improvement
  • Generally positive student feedback

Average

Ranks 9-13 • Avg: 4.57

Eric Boos
Richard Derman
Dean Humphrey
Lindsay Masten
Brandelyn Andres

Characteristics:

  • Meets departmental standards
  • Some specific areas needing attention
  • Lindsay Masten shows Q2 concerns (3.64)

Below Average

Ranks 14-17 • Avg: 4.40

Jessica Crocker
Sarah Lange
Chelsea Stone
Matthias Petsche

Characteristics:

  • Performing below departmental expectations
  • Multiple areas requiring improvement
  • Matthias Petsche shows significant Q2 issues (3.73)

Needs Improvement

Ranks 18-21 • Avg: 3.52

Michael Werner
Jonah Fleeger
Jodi Kolpakov
Maureen Costa

Characteristics:

  • Significantly below departmental standards
  • Critical performance issues
  • Immediate intervention required

Full Rankings Table

RankInstructorScoreStatusCoursesResponsesQ2 (Grading)Gap
#1Kenneth Ottinger4.95Excellent13/55.00+0.47
#2Jill Brugler5.00Excellent22/125.00+0.52
#3Dana Cohn5.00Excellent33/105.00+0.52
#4Thomas Schumacher4.67Above Average13/124.67+0.19
#5Laura Bloomenstein4.86Excellent419/674.84+0.38
#6Kat Brint4.81Above Average17/135.00+0.34
#7Benjamin Norton4.75Above Average429/564.38+0.27
#8Stephanie Lauderback4.71Above Average27/174.71+0.24
#9Eric Boos4.60Average216/324.63+0.12
#10Richard Derman4.59Average28/264.63+0.11
#11Dean Humphrey4.64Above Average48/354.86+0.16
#12Lindsay Masten4.50Average111/173.64 ⚠️+0.02
#13Brandelyn Andres4.50Average210/404.78+0.02
#14Jessica Crocker4.47Below Average28/314.18+0.00
#15Sarah Lange4.45Below Average429/734.41-0.03
#16Chelsea Stone4.32Below Average28/274.50-0.16
#17Matthias Petsche4.35Below Average111/283.73 ⚠️-0.13
#18Michael Werner4.00Needs Improvement*33/334.00-0.48
#19Jonah Fleeger4.00Needs Improvement11/34.00-0.48
#20Jodi Kolpakov3.38Needs Improvement13/53.67 ⚠️-1.10
#21Maureen Costa2.69Needs Improvement210/192.77 ⚠️-1.79

Q-Dimension Performance Heatmap

Color-coded visualization of all faculty across Q1-Q7 dimensions. Darker colors indicate lower scores requiring attention.

Instructor
Q1
Clear Guidelines
Q2
Timely Grading
Q3
Assessment
Q4
Participation
Q5
Responses
Q6
Online Org
Q7
Teaching
Avg
#1Kenneth Ottinger
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.67
5.00
5.00
4.95
#2Jill Brugler
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
#3Dana Cohn
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
#4Thomas Schumacher
4.67
4.67
4.67
5.00
4.67
4.00
5.00
4.67
#5Laura Bloomenstein
4.83
4.84
4.83
4.77
4.88
4.88
4.82
4.86
#6Kat Brint
4.86
5.00
4.71
4.71
5.00
4.71
4.71
4.81
#7Benjamin Norton
4.92
4.38
4.97
4.71
4.79
4.66
4.80
4.75
#8Stephanie Lauderback
4.43
4.71
4.80
4.71
4.86
4.57
5.00
4.71
#9Eric Boos
4.50
4.63
4.57
4.63
4.53
4.57
4.75
4.60
#10Richard Derman
4.63
4.63
4.75
4.75
4.63
4.25
4.50
4.59
#11Dean Humphrey*
4.69
4.86
4.59
4.59
4.58
N/A
4.52
4.64
#12Lindsay Masten
4.40
3.64
4.64
4.84
4.64
4.64
4.70
4.50
#13Brandelyn Andres
4.40
4.78
4.50
4.30
4.70
4.71
4.67
4.50
#14Jessica Crocker
4.63
4.18
4.50
4.50
4.63
4.63
4.25
4.47
#15Sarah Lange
4.55
4.41
4.72
4.50
4.38
4.31
4.28
4.45
#16Chelsea Stone*
4.25
4.50
4.34
4.63
4.63
N/A
4.50
4.32
#17Matthias Petsche
4.45
3.73
4.55
4.55
4.45
4.45
4.27
4.35
#18Michael Werner*
4.33
4.00
4.33
4.00
4.33
N/A
3.67
4.00
#19Jonah Fleeger
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
#20Jodi Kolpakov
3.33
3.67
3.00
3.33
3.67
3.33
3.33
3.38
#21Maureen Costa
2.52
2.77
2.80
2.81
2.75
3.17
1.81
2.69
≥4.8
4.5-4.8
4.2-4.5
4.0-4.2
3.5-4.0
3.0-3.5
<3.0
N/A

* Q6 (Online Organization) is N/A for in-person courses and excluded from aggregate calculations